Why we must stop thinking of skills as being ‘for life’
We’ve been here before. It’s not the first time that a skills crisis has loomed on the horizon, and sadly recent reports that the UK is hurtling towards a ‘catastrophic’ digital skills shortage that could spell ‘disaster’ for our economy are part of a continuing trend. Such stories seemingly appear on a weekly basis, and to varying degrees are indicative of one recurring issue: that we as a society are not set up for the future demands of work.
Our own studies certainly corroborate this view. We recently assessed the state of the UK workforce by analysing Office for National Statistics (ONS) data to establish how prepared the UK is for the future of work, and how automating technology might impact jobs in the future. We found that the volume of work that could be automated in the UK by the end of this year is equivalent to 1.4 million full-time roles. That’s the equivalent of 4.8% of work currently undertaken across the country.
“We found that the volume of work that could be automated in the UK by the end of this year is equivalent to 1.4 million full-time roles”
These figures are indicative of a broad transition in the very nature of work which the pandemic had only served to accelerate. Technology already complements our capabilities as humans in so many ways, but the introduction of intelligent technologies such as machine learning will transform business beyond all recognition by automating countless tasks, and augmenting our ability to undertake others. So when the government recently announced that it would introduce legislature to support vital reforms in adult education, and enable individuals to reskill for the future, it came as welcome news. But how does the Skills and Post-16 Education Bill really stack up when it comes to meeting the demands of the future of work? How will it actively equip adults to develop – and continue expanding on – the skills needed to work effectively alongside technology in the short- and long-term?
The bill at a glance – and what it’s missing
The government’s bill aims to deliver on the prime minister’s ‘Lifetime Skills Guarantee’, and ensure every individual has the chance to gain the skills they need, when they need them, in order to secure ‘great jobs’.
The legislation outlines a variety of new policies to help achieve this, including local skills improvement plans, strengthened intervention powers for the education secretary, and flexible lifelong loans systems. It puts employers at the heart of post-16 skills by having them set out requirements of ‘employer-led standards’ for an occupation. In essence, this will require groups of employers to detail the knowledge, skills and behaviours required of roles to ensure the technical education and training provided is reflective of labour market skills and needs.
“Without crucial government intervention, employers would likely face difficulty in finding the right talent to not only support the implementation of newly created technologies, but also ensure they deliver on their potential”
It’s encouraging to see a renewed focus on investing in equipping the workforce for the future. Without crucial government intervention, employers would likely face difficulty in finding the right talent to not only support the implementation of newly created technologies, but also ensure they deliver on their potential. However, the legislation crucially misses an important factor in its reskilling objectives – it fails to acknowledge that reskilling can no longer be considered a simple ‘one and done’ process going forward. We must change the way we think about skills entirely to meet the demands of the future of work.